by dmac » Mon Jun 20, 2016 4:42 pm
Given the logic of my assessment three leaves back, who in their right mind would conclude Tina was the target rather than Sheila? Show me why Sheila was not the intended target and that Sue was a leftover? Prove Tina was the target, not Sheila! NOBODY EVER LOOKED AT SHEILA AS TARGET because they are lazybones MORONS. Instead, both Sheila and Tina have been considered a possible perp?! PCSO did one, and we did the other?
Wow, that pile of shit doesn't smell any better. Ring a familiar bell, Tina? We've done a MASSIVE disservice by not seeing the ever-present lack of logic in papers, theories, stories. We should have connected the dots long before.
Show anyone but Sue was the target, given non-existent 'ample' evidence otherwise. Explain the confusion: if it was Tina as target, Tina could/would have been taken many times that day without anyone ever noticing her abduction/absence. Sheila? Incredibly unlikely. So that means the killers KNEW Tina was home and SHE was the target?! EXPONENTIALLY absurd!
If Tina / Sheila were a mistaken target, the killers would have killed all in 27 had they felt their "target" was there. Explain that.
ANYONE THEORIZING "TINA AS TARGET" NEEDS TO EXPLAIN WHY EVERYONE IN 27 WASN'T ALSO MURDERED THAT NIGHT!
INSANE BULLSHIT! Black van out front waiting for radio contact to know that everyone in Keddie had seen their black van parked in front of 28, but they only wanted radio contact to know Tina MAY ACTUALLY GO BACK TO 28 from 27 so they can abduct her? Christ, this is black choppers insanity.
Sue, no matter her foibles, didn't abandon her kids that night, never was asked to the Back Door to be Bo's dickbag. Loon said "Sue didn't go that way" (sexually promiscuous), which is a huge lie element explaining the actual motives.
I believe Sue's sleeping with others led to rage, but that history was obvious long before Bo showed up. Logically, it was Marty (male slut) who was sexually fixated on Sue. Loon (female slut) would look at a tuning fork as competition to her own open-legged policy with DT, Stoy, DeCrona, Bo, Dee Lake, Tony, the Walke Brothers, Keddie Machete- or any spike that came up from the creosote along the WP line.
If Marty and Loon was an 'open marriage', I promise they wanted to fuck others (and did), yet would hate supposed paramours simply for being "the other". Their open marriage was a murderous bond of double-crossing acridity: Sue was never safe, no matter her level of interaction with the Murder Twins. All the killers needed was to feel lesser for Sue's supposed level of involvement in their lives.
It's clear from Martin's own words he was extremely jealous of anyone that would fuck his wife, despite fucking (or wanting to fuck) anything that moved. It's also clear, despite being known for fucking any soft rope that moved, Loon despised a man who would stray from her inter-continentally-stretched snatch.
Note how the terminology Marty uses for adults vs children (all levels) is "I only killed the girls."
That's from his recalled confession (whereby Crimely filed a false report denying it occurred), and it lines up with not recognizing females as adults, much less as equals.
It's a misogynist's very fear / stupidity which lies within any fact or fiction we've learned of Marty.
As you enter the girls' room, Sue slept just inside the doorway to the right. As the killers entered, the foot of her bed almost met the doorway. Evidence shows that sleeping arrangement had been so FOR A LONG DAMNED TIME. Tina and Sheila on the distant, bigger bed. Read my recent posts to keep up on CONCLUSIVE photo evidence.
Give me a series of events that hold true to the facts, and explain why Tina was the target and not Sheila?
PROVE why the target was NOT Sue.
PROVE A THEORY at all! The best "theory" input these days is proving a macro-feature of a theory is plausible.
I don't mean to sound derogatory or dismissive, but to foment charges and theories / explanations which contradict basic facts (particularly facts vs wild Black Van / Black Hat speculation) is simply unacceptable.
I've laid out almost all the cards I can publicly present, yet nobody's taken me up on something as simple as a logical, fact-checked debate?! With my lapsing memory, I'm an easy target- yet, still no takers?
Reddit wanted me to do a AMA a couple years back, and I asked to get Princess and Gamberg involved. As soon as I laid out that I wanted a fair discussion from as many sources as possible, the interest folded. Go Reddit! Proven Bastion of Internet Hypocrisy & Stupidity!
Sorry, I answered a few more Qs in one shot than I'd intended.
"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."
reach me at
keddie28 AT gmail DOT com