by dmac » Sun Jun 11, 2017 7:12 pm
This is just a few thoughts about a few ramifications if the bathroom light was the main constant, sole light: Why are blood smears supposedly on both BR doors and all exterior knobs?
The dimensions of stains on the girls' room door is most apparent on the OUTSIDE of that door, with sporadic blood on the jamb-side portion of the door, and the least amount on the interior face ending 1/2" from the jamb edge, and all stains on the interior side indicating an upward direction of the fingers. In other words, the palm side was on the exterior of the door, continues in a pattern exhibiting most blood was on the exterior, with the fingers rising upwards while leaving scant blood within half an inch from the interior edge.
These stains begin roughly 3" above the highest portion of the knob's flash shield, which tells me a killer opened or (at least partially) closed an already-ajar door. Check out the positions you'd use to open/close a door: pull closed or push open an ajar door while avoiding using the knob. How would you do it? Use a wet hand, do it natuarlly, then look at the pattern of water you leave behind.
The height of the door handles in 28 were standard. I've pointed out the heights of both vx and killers numerous times, and all their heights would normally put their hands inches above the latch/knob when handling an ajar door by it's edge rather than the handle.
Think of why you, as a bloody-handed killer, would OPEN a door. HOW?
Think of why you, as a bloody-handed killer, would CLOSE a door. HOW?
The lighting from the bathroom was the main, sole light. The killers weren't turning lights on and off. Sue and Tina were the first attacked, as proved by clothing and glasses and PHOTOS.
There was a sweatshirt found on the back of the toilet tank in the bathroom, and LE took that bathroom sink cabinet door, believing blood was on it. Perhaps thinking the killers spent time in their (the sole lit room) cleaning up (after all, there's indication they believe at least one killer cut himself). Furthermore, although Sheila had no known LE-written recognition of the pink pantsuit, she also didn't recognize that sweatshirt as belonging in 28. She also said there were a pair of shoes Tina used to where that MAY be missing.
Why would there be blood, as I described, on either the boys' or girl's BR doors?
A: We know the killers interacted with, at bare minimum, Justin from the boys' room.
B: We know the killers, at some point, went back to the girls' BR to scavange lamp cord, used in postmortem staging on Sue. The phone cord was cut from the rear wall beside Tina's side of the bed, wound up neatly, and left beside the table in the LR where the knife, hamer, and bloody denim shirt were posed.
OH HOLY FUCK. Marty and Bo DID go back to the bar in lighter versions of their disco suits! They had to have, to be seen blood-free. In those same clothes. AFTER screams were heard. Dammit, somewhere in the reports, there must be proof of what they wore when they came back, because that denim shirt was POSED there, and is as contrived as Sue's knife and Johnny's hammer: staging. In this case, the denim shirt says, "Marty and Bo were seen mugging John Travolta for his clothes. Meanwhile, the crime scene (AND JUSTIN) says at least one of the killers wore denim pants and shirt.
Back to the bloody doorknobs and doors: I've shown many of the mentioned photos in the past, and even enhanced real or theorized blood on many of these doors and knobs for all to compare. For the most part, I've since deleted them from the site, but I'm sure many diehards still recall (or even have) them.
LE found blood on all the EXTERIOR doors' knobs (often even on both int/ext sides of the same knob)- except, I believe, the basement doors. Hard to say, as there are no reports or photos. And I've seen blood AROUND the int side of the front door knob. For sake of transparency, LE could and should have photographed the int/jam/ext portions of ALL doors-- whether blood was apparent or not-- as they so well did with the Girls' BR door. I never saw such photos, ever, of other doors in the collection of all negs Gam had reprinted.
Jamie said (initially) that he went up the back steps after pulling the boys from the window Sun AM. He also stated the exterior back door was ajar. The print at the base of those back steps still tells me said owner was walking UPSTAIRS, not down. Either Jamie is a killer, or that print near the bottom of the rear stairs was made hours prior to Jamie going in 28, and F-ING DAYS PRIOR TO LE NOTICING IT.
========================
I wrote the above in the middle of the night weeks ago, and was tired and rambling. In revisiting it today, I cleaned it up for posting and, in doing so, had a major AHA! moment about the bloody denim shirt.
I don't know where I was going with this when I wrote it (half-asleep), but it had to do with whether the killers were walking in or out of the rooms (based on the blood patterns). Try it out for yourself.
It also had to do with WHY they would go in and out of the rooms. For the boys room, they needed access to threaten them, pull them into the action, force them into the closet. Any or all above. For the girls room, it's a given Sue and Tina were both immediately involved, but the killers returned for bindings (lamp cord) and to cut the phone line (they knew the boys were still alive, so taking the phone off the hook was to prevent access for the victims, and cutting the line was to prevent kids from using the phone after they left). Where they cut the phone line and neatly coiled it means something, otherwise they would have cut it at the base of the phone. Perhaps they wanted thicker wire for visual impact? All were certainly dead before wire was used, so the choice of wire meant something. Not to Marty, if he was being truthful when he said he'd "do your business and get the hell out".
Hmmm....
"Back off, man. I'm a scientist."
reach me at
keddie28 AT gmail DOT com